CHAPTER 2 : IMPOLITENESS

IMPOLITENESS, WHERE ARE WE?

The very first topical post; nerved us up and sometimes carelessly, we post it anyway. But to be beared in mind, the target readers are locals or "concerned" Malaysian. Several words being highlighted, do they signifies something or symbolises mostly everything? Or did “concerned” sounded mocking? Now that's IMPOLITE! The aftereffect, emphasising , upon reading this first "intelligence”, it is not to justify any facts or rather heavily validating them as its not entirely ours to be handled as such. It is the continuism that moved us, respective writers to share and to educationally humorously speculate, all in the name of introducing our deliverance style, comprehension range and framework (basic belief) and yet ultimately, if info are misused and mislead, therefore, encourage correctional and comments. And yes, impoliteness is now our first focus of discussion!

Defining impoliteness, through dictionary is really easy, understanding them is a no PhD work, assuming them in numerous aspects is entirely non the time-consuming type. In our opinions, Malaysians always speak ,them thoughts, rather formally or otherwise. It mostly sounds and looks debacle, debate or potentially even ”war-inviting”. But simplicity never come to the end where blood actually spills because of it. Malaysians know their limits and everyday apply them whenever needed. Democracy here, tells that she is still practical and educationally functional. Do you find for example: "hoi mangkuk,laa ade lagi kau ingatkan dah mamXXX?": annoying or cultural? Well, lets visit ”Melaka” and blend in, do so. It maybe at a conscious scale, in Malaysia that only impoliteness counts at the very least of Malaysians worse habits. Why? Because impoliteness for now has never been able to picture anything conformal or used to validate or influence on anything specifically.

But to know in detail,curiously, we will enlighten you a few standpoints, data-tabling research extracts, absolutely at a slight consensus scale of what impoliteness is and definitely try to seek deep, patriotically, are we in that seem-to-be-true proven theories?? 

Generally, many thinks that impoliteness is a British twin of American rudeness, the usage of the word even made us sounds bombastically majestic. Which at some point as well, some says not. Culerper and Tarkourafi both genuine scholars but somehow able to attest that, although repelling each other, impoliteness is unintentional and rudeness is perhaps otherwise. Now "titHranSZ" accept that because we can lay out fundamentally through a convincing motion, that impoliteness is not negatively behavioural, word exploitation and manner damnation. Assuming that a conversation happens between a hearer and a speaker. The both may come from the same community or maybe even from a happy family. In sociolinguistics,impoliteness,

effectively,is perhaps a mode of showing that we are the same,as we jokes, kids and tease or mock in bantersime. Unintentional cause its a habit shown by Malaysians to dictates that impoliteness is somewhat a colourful sub linguistics in most different dialects.Malacca's swearin' and northern cussing,are both harmoniously combined and creates human laughter.When rude is annoying and rejected,how those assessments may call for a mutual in impoliteness? Impoliteness is not rudeness, still theoretical.

In terms of impoliteness that emerge between strangers, now thats can be called rudeness. One,who does not concern for social ethics are savages and uncivilised. Jokes and informality,swearing and condemning inhumanly are very different at every extent. So how are they different? Now indulge yourself in some simple tricks. Firstly, mocking is not new in linguistic. It is a subtopic of banterisme. What is banterisme, look onto the dictionary! Which is also a form of directive mocking. However, do u find it annoying and heart-aching? We don't think so! Secondly, expressions ans and assumptions. For example,please and okay are 2 very common words which aligned and accurate facial expressions help in interpreting ones intention, and that a no-need-to-tell. But when one say please, with joining brows and cynical smiles, it forms a threat. Here shows how in formal conversation that deals strangers,impoliteness can act so thin that rude will start to prevail unintentionally. Hence impoliteness play very specifically and need to be played carefully. It can be misleading and how impoliteness is an informality but different as in POLITE informality, these will be discussed next time,INSYAALLAH. 

The last but not the very least, importantly how we view impoliteness itself.In professional extent, without any physical atrocities, verbal plays major role in presenting personalities and ideals. Its a direct form of mode of communication so that business discussed are set finally on very best terms without harm done. This crucially means that at some point, impoliteness are very different to informality, watch out cause touching some mans heart can be as touching snakes nest. 

There are deeper aspects that we want to assess and share. Don't mistake impoliteness for rudeness nor impoliteness for polite in formalities.Everything has their own scales and believe it or not there are theories and researches showing what impoliteness actually is,rather than assuming,at the lowest value,that impoliteness is simply rude.